841
The Hardline / Re: Union Membership not required under AEA Contract?
« on: Jul 08, 2011, 06:26 pm »
Interestingly, this topic came up at work today. Now, this is all second-hand information, but what I was told was that within the last two years, there was a Supreme Court ruling that no person can be required to join a union in order to obtain employment. (I seem to recall something of the sort, but am having trouble looking it up). Therefore, an SM (or actor), can accept a job under a union contract, and send a letter to AEA declining to join.
The people I was talking to described it just as tempestgypsy did. I am surprised that health insurance is an option as a non-AEA member, but the people I was talking to today (management-level folks) assured me that it was.
From what they were saying, it's becoming more popular with theatres who do something like a large seasonal show, where they might hire a bunch of actors who wouldn't necessarily want to join AEA.
The people I was talking to described it just as tempestgypsy did. I am surprised that health insurance is an option as a non-AEA member, but the people I was talking to today (management-level folks) assured me that it was.
From what they were saying, it's becoming more popular with theatres who do something like a large seasonal show, where they might hire a bunch of actors who wouldn't necessarily want to join AEA.
