346
The Hardline / Re: Understudies, and actors "calling out"
« on: Aug 08, 2011, 11:31 am »
If this was done with the consent of the producers, it's just a bitter pill to swallow. It's their show, and if they want to create inter-cast chaos by allowing B to call out of a show for "no reason" that's on their shoulders.
And if I'm reading your situation correctly, A's understudy would not have been prepared to go on without the put in rehearsal, correct? So A being pressured into performing that show while sick was a more solid plan than allowing A's understudy to go on who hadn't been put in yet.
Did B tell the producers it was simply because she wanted her understudy to get a chance to perform, or did she give them a reason that would make them not want to allow her onstage (like vocal exhaustion)? The cast may know something the producers don't, but if B lied to the producers you certainly can't fault them for protecting one of their principle actors.
And if I'm reading your situation correctly, A's understudy would not have been prepared to go on without the put in rehearsal, correct? So A being pressured into performing that show while sick was a more solid plan than allowing A's understudy to go on who hadn't been put in yet.
Did B tell the producers it was simply because she wanted her understudy to get a chance to perform, or did she give them a reason that would make them not want to allow her onstage (like vocal exhaustion)? The cast may know something the producers don't, but if B lied to the producers you certainly can't fault them for protecting one of their principle actors.