235
« on: Jun 21, 2014, 03:36 pm »
I just lived though it.
We were "okay'ed" for certain changes, not others.
I knew we were in trouble when the artistic director ask for me to stop putting line changes into the performance report. I went to the production manager, artistic director and general manager and got the outline of what changes were allowed by our agreement with the rights holder and what changes were not allow - and what changes were in a gray area. The reason I was so involved is the agreement got changed mid-way through the process when the rights were sold. And I was worried about our tech time if we were going to have to make a radical changes mid tech, I wanted to make sure we had those plans a foot (like if we had to change a location of a song, did I have a tech plan to support that).
Philosophically, as an artist, I have very strong feelings about this. As a production stage manager, I am hired to do a specific job - but it's my responsibility to make sure that my producer knows what is happening in the rehearsal hall - as long as we are not breaking any LAWS or AEA Rules, then I support that - - - - but I need to make sure the people who have to make the big decisions and pay the piper at the end of the day know what's going on.
In this case, I think the artistic director / director was going to do what he wanted to do . . . regardless of what the agreement with the rights holder . . . and some directors are like that. Do what you want with public domain work, but when the rights are held . . . you to honor that agreement - regardless of what they specify. Don't like it - don't do that show.
The rights holders are artists to and we need to honor their work and their vision.