Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MatthewShiner

Pages: 1 ... 105 106 [107] 108 109 ... 148
1591
Stage Management: Plays & Musicals / Re: Barrell-Through Tech
« on: Apr 07, 2009, 08:01 am »
Tech is for techies?  Again, Tech is for everyone involved in the production . . . leaving the actors of the equation is bad news. 

My thoughts is tech usually takes the time you give it - if you have to tech a show in a day, you will take a show in a day, if you give it two weeks, it magically takes two weeks.  Creating deadlines in any tech situation is good pressure to keep on the whole staff.  (by this time we should be done with Act 1, by this time we shall be done with the show, by this time will do a run.)  Giving yourself those deadlines will help push along the tech regardless of the time given.

1592
The Hardline / Re: Musician's Union and Stage Managers
« on: Apr 06, 2009, 03:57 pm »
You should contact your local union, as I am pretty sure that there are just enough differences between unions that could snag you up.  Even better, speak to your contractor (if this a show specific issue), as he will know everything.

I have worked with union musicians on many occasions, and every time it was a different situation, different rules, different parameters.  What I did like about union gigs was that effortlessness of subs and how that was handled. 


1593
Tools of the Trade / Re: Oops! I didn't mean to send that.
« on: Mar 29, 2009, 12:21 pm »
I have to admit that although reply all can get you into trouble, if an e-mail discussion is started to a group, keeping it going as a group is a good idea - so everyone can maintain either input in the situation, collaborate on a solution, or just be kept in the loop.  I hate when a designer says "What ever became of that issue . . . ". 

1594
The Hardline / Guthrie Cutting Budget
« on: Mar 27, 2009, 03:51 pm »
http://www.startribune.com/entertainment/onstage/41838967.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUUsZ

From Star Tribune. 

The Guthrie Theater will cut its next fiscal-year budget by 14 percent, from $28 million to $24.1 million. In an interview Wednesday, Director Joe Dowling said the reductions will be made through wage freezes, salary reductions among senior management, furloughs and by reducing expenses in production. The package mirrors cuts at other nonprofit arts organizations that have been affected by reduced endowments, donations and patronage.

"We're living in the real world," Dowling said. "We're planning a season as full as we can make it, and we're going to do internally what needs to be done."

Dowling said he would reduce his salary by 10 percent and that four senior managers will take 5 percent cuts. Actors Equity and the Stagehands union have both agreed in principle to wage freezes (awaiting ratification). Independent employees will experience wage freezes and a mandatory one-week furlough.

The Guthrie has 150 full-time employees. During productions, up to 350 people are working in the theater. Dowling said both of those areas will be reduced, though he would not give specifics.

"We'll undertake the reduction in force in a way that both reflects our respect for the individual people involved and makes certain that we can do what we set out to do," he said.

Trish Santini, director of external affairs, said she was not authorized by board president Randall Hogan to release Dowling's salary. The Star Tribune reported in January that Dowling's 2007 compensation was $682,229 (which included a $100,000 bonus). Dowling disputed that Wednesday, but did not offer specifics.

"The focus on me and my salary, which has been inaccurately reported, and I would say somewhat with ill-informed research, has led to a considerable amount of discussion in the community," Dowling said. "Let's take the heat off that and talk about the fact that here's an organization where people are willing all through the organization to make sacrifices."

1595
The Hardline / Seattle Rep Cutting Budget - but moving forward
« on: Mar 27, 2009, 03:49 pm »
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/thearts/2008932588_rep27m.html

From the Seattle Times web site . . .

On stage, backstage, Seattle Repertory Theatre cuts back

By Janet I. Tu

Seattle Times staff reporter

Buffeted by the sinking economy, a decline in subscription-ticket sales and an endowment it can't draw from, Seattle Repertory Theatre — the state's largest nonprofit regional playhouse — is taking some drastic steps, cutting its upcoming budget by one-third and going to a four-day workweek.

For the next fiscal year, which starts July 1, full-time staff will work 32 hours a week. The theater is also planning two fewer productions, doing more co-productions with other theater companies, presenting smaller-cast plays and cutting a day from performance weeks.

Together, the moves are intended to bring the Rep's budget down from $10 million this season to about $6.5 million next season — the smallest budget in a decade.

Though they've been mounting for more than a year, the Rep's troubles are similar to those faced by many arts organizations locally and nationally.

"What's unique is how we're dealing with it," said marketing and communications director Katie Jackman — in particular, a theater of this size going to a 32-hour workweek. "It's fundamentally changing how we operate."

Most of the 40 full-time, annual, nonunion employees — who work mainly in administration, marketing and educational outreach — will work Tuesdays through Fridays.

As for the union-represented seasonal staff, whose numbers vary from year to year and can get as high as 50 workers, agreements have yet to be reached.

The theater has asked three locals of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees (IATSE) to reopen contract negotiations.

Those three locals, which represent some 25 full-time seasonal stagehands, set builders and wardrobe crew at the Rep, would be most affected by the shorter workweek. Their current contracts provide for a 40-hour-minimum workweek.

Though they're discussing the issue with the Rep's management, they haven't yet agreed to renegotiate.

In the past, the theater has asked for — and Local 15 agreed to — midterm-contract concessions, including forgoing pension contributions and cost-of-living increases, said Tara Heinecke, managing-business representative of IATSE Local 15.

"Nobody wants to see the theater go away. It's not just a job, it's a passion," Heinecke said. Still, "something needs to change fundamentally in the way (the Rep is managed), if we have to keep doing this."

The Rep's troubles have been building.

Since 2006, the theater has seen a yearly decline of about 9 percent in subscription sales, said Jackman, noting that such sales have also declined in other theaters nationally.

Its endowment — which had been the envy of theaters with smaller or nonexistent endowments — has taken a beating in the stock market and has now dipped below the $14 million original principal, meaning the Rep can't draw from it next season.

Having an endowment, which provided about $1.5 million to the 2008-09 budget, is double-edged, said managing director Benjamin Moore. "When you have income from it, it's fabulous." But it has allowed the Rep to build a larger operation that now needs to be cut.

The theater's draft budget for next season also estimates that grants and donations will drop by about $500,000.

In addition, one day will be cut from performance weeks, which will run Wednesdays through Sundays, rather than the current Tuesdays through Sundays. (Previews, though, will still happen on Tuesdays.)

The Rep has already had layoffs and required its full-time employees to take a two-week furlough.

"We have to live within our means," Moore said. "Everyone gets that. They know they have to make some personal sacrifices."

Across the country, other regional theaters are also facing difficulties.

The Guthrie Theater in Minneapolis is cutting its budget by 14 percent and has asked unions for a salary freeze. Shakespeare & Company in Lenox, Mass., is laying off seven employees and instituting a 10 percent pay cut.

"It's a tough, tough time for all of us. We're just trying to hang on, be creative," said Linda Jacobs, spokeswoman for Theatre Communications Group, a national organization for professional nonprofit theaters.

"It's a really important time for theaters to be a part of communities because it's a place for people to come together and feel united."

Seattle Times theater critic Misha Berson contributed to this report.

1596
Tools of the Trade / Re: Oops! I didn't mean to send that.
« on: Mar 27, 2009, 11:19 am »
I have the mother of all stories on this . . . a friend of mine set out an article from playbill.com about his new musical he wrote . . . and a new out of town try out.

I responded by "Who do i have to f**k to get this job?" - that was the kind of relationship me and this friend had.

I had hit reply to all . . . and it went out to about 100 people, some playwrights, some actors, a lot of producers (a lot of big, Broadway producers).

I cringed when I discovered my response went to everyone.

I hid for about 30 seconds, and then sent out a follow-up e-mail, basically apologizing for sending the response out to everyone, but then spun it into "That's how much I believe in this show . . . ".  I got about ten - 12 responses, all sent out "reply all", saying it was refreshing to see a stage manager being so excited about a show . . . and a couple requests for a resume.

In the end it worked out, but I think it was because of my sense of humor and owning up to the problem.

1597
That's me . . . the Irreverent Stage Manager.


1598
I am sorry that I haven't be able to respond to everyone that has requested the PPT, but after some thought, I would prefer that it not be openly posted on the web for everyone to download.  I would like some control over who I distribute it to.

I thank you for damjamkato for taking the time to post it, but I have edited his post to remove the link, and would prefer that my work not be just posted for anyone to have.  I would like to have some control over my work.

And on that note . . . I have posted it as a web presentation at http://www.stagemanager.net/10minutes.htm.  I will keep it for a while, and then take down eventually.  Please do not steal my work.

1599
The Hardline / Re: Actor Notes - After opening
« on: Mar 25, 2009, 10:03 pm »
Um, I think that is TOTALLY splitting hairs.  How do you give a "maintenance" note without giving an "acting" note.

If you are charged with with maintaining the show artistically, then you are going to have to give "acting" notes.  What happens when you have to put in understudies? or replacements?  How do you engage in a conversation when an actor begins to stray, but they defend it with shooting back justification based upon motivation and emotion.  (Actor A says Actor B is changing their performance, Actor B claims it is the right motivation based on something Actor A is doing . . . )  If you can enage an artist in an artistic conversation you are going to get a lot further then just saying "stop doing that" or "just do it the way you used to do it."

100's of little things change in the show, especially in a long run of a show - you are never going to keep the show EXACTLY the way a show played opening night, and to be honest, most directors would want a show to grow.  You need to be able to give "acting" notes, you need to be able to engage an actor in an "artistic" conversation about their work.  It's sort of part of the standard definition of our job - now as a student, or being a SM on a short run, or if there is someone else charged with the artistic quality of the production - then it's not your job, but most theatre's would expect you to maintain the show artistically as well as technically.

My job isn't to create a photo copy of the show on opening, but allow the normal growth of a performance to happen.  Think of it as gardening and tending to a topiary.  If the show is in the shape of horse when it opens, I need to make sure it doesn't end up as a unicorn, or a bear or a moose.  But letting the show grow, and fill out, and grow into those bare patches that were there.

It's important - from the very beginning of table work - for a stage manager to start crawling into the director's head, taking notes, and be have all the documentation to back up what the director had in mind - but ultimately, a production becomes it's own entity.  For example, on my current production, once the (positive) reviews hit, although the performance didn't change, immediately changes happened in the audience's reaction - the laughed a lot more, they responded a lot more - the actors had to learn how to hold for laughter, navigate audience reaction, hold blocking back a bit - all things that effected the acting.  I couldn't tell them to just do the show as they did opening night.  (On a related note, I have had to adjust cue calling as the show adjusted to the audience.)

When an understudy goes on, I always make it clear that me and the understudy are going to meet after the show to go over notes - help them with their acting - help them with their emotions and motivation for scenes.

Also, there is a lot of just reminding them of their motivation and emotions in keeping the show true to the director's vision in the long run.  6, 8, 12, 24 weeks into the run - you will find yourself having these "Artistic" conversations.

This is one of the major reasons every stage manager should have some sort of directing background (along with design) - we are just secretaries, schedulers, disciplinarians and cue callers - we are a part of the artistic team -  as well as the technical team.

I know you are trying to draw a line in the sand, and say this type of note is okay, and this type of note if forbidden.  But in reality, at least with my style of stage management, and at the level I work as a stage manager, there are A LOT of "acting" notes given - and I am the second in command behind an assistant director who also is charged with the front line of maintaining the show.

I think as a younger stage manager, it might be good to be able to draw those lines in the sand, but as you continue down this path . . . you will find yourself being able to comfortably take on more and more responsibility.

1600
Employment / Re: Post-graduation time off?
« on: Mar 25, 2009, 12:07 am »
One of the good reasons not to be dates on your resume is because of gaps in your employment.  I don't think taking some time off will hurt your chances for jobs in the future.  To be honest, many stage managers take "time off" - work hard on tour for 18 months, and then takes some down time.  It's happens a lot.

My only concern about taking time off is are you going to lose forward momentum you have built up?  Will you loose hot connections? 

The last thing is . . . if you get out of the business for awhile, will it be hard for you to come back to it.  Let's be honest, making a living in the arts is hard work, and if you find you can make a living doing something else, it's awfully hard to leave behind a stable paycheck and jump back into the world.

1601
Tarp can be slippery - and how do you attach it the floor.

Cardboard is VERY bad - it can be very slippery. 

1602
Why not just a roll of low pile carpet - tape out on the carpet, and unroll for rehearsal.


1603
Employment / Re: Where do I begin?
« on: Mar 21, 2009, 07:23 pm »
I am unsure about when you graduate what your status will be to work in the states.  I don't know many non-American citizen stage managers to know how they went about dealing with the paperwork and status.  (I know a bit about people from other AEA unions working in the states, but not much about your current situation.)  I think that would be the more pressing issue.  Being that theater jobs, especially paying theater jobs are a challenge to come by, the additional work to deal with someone who has a different work status may be just enough of a red flag to keep someone from hiring you.    At my theater we do hire quite a bit of non-American directors and designers and the paperwork can be a challenge - enough to have my production manager tear out her hair at times.  I am not sure how it work on an open ended project.  I guess a lot will depend on how you go about dealing with citizenship.  And American AEA might have a say in this too - as they would be an advocate for hiring an American Stage Manager over a foreign stage manager.  You know most about your situation, but you should do as much home work as possible on this issue.

I know that you can do an internship after college and usually stay in the USA on a student visa, so I would recommend, since your goal is to work in NYC, trying to get an internship in NYC so you can make those connections.

1604
Students and Novice Stage Managers / Re: Rutgers - facilities?
« on: Mar 18, 2009, 08:19 pm »
You might want to contact the other schools you applied for and let them know you have been accepted by Rutgers and have been given a deadline.  By asking nicely, you might be able to see if their acceptance timeline would fall before you make a decision, or force them to make an offer sooner.

I was in a very similar situation, where my second choice school accepted me first - so I contact my first choice school, letting them know my situation.  They were extremely helpful, and within 24 hours, they made an offer to me.

Remember, as competitive as the schools are to get into, the schools are also competing to get the best students into their programs. 

1605
Students and Novice Stage Managers / Re: Rutgers - facilities?
« on: Mar 18, 2009, 12:53 pm »
before you accept, you should visit the campus and see how you feel there . . . Grad school is a little like a marriage . . . and you want to know what you are getting into.

Pages: 1 ... 105 106 [107] 108 109 ... 148
riotous