Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MatthewShiner

Pages: 1 ... 74 75 [76] 77 78 ... 148
1126
Students and Novice Stage Managers / Re: Mentorship Program
« on: Apr 11, 2011, 09:51 pm »
AT THIS TIME I HAVE TAKEN ON THREE PEOPLE . . .

I will focus on them for the next couple of months, and report back to the admins, and discuss how to move forward on the program.

Thanks for your interest.

1127
Dear god, how did theatre happen before stage managers came into existence . . . pretty sure the Greeks did have stage managers . . . and yet some how the gods descended . . . and the plots resolved.  Part of being a stage manager is dealing with the thankless nature of the job, and, because of that, we often, perhaps, over inflate our importance . . . at the end of the day, my job can can be parsed out and done by a variety of people.

Now, I can do it pretty well . . . and probably better then if it was parsed out . . . and that is what makes me an important part of a team - important but NOT NECESSARY.

1128
The Green Room / Re: How to recover from mistakes
« on: Apr 11, 2011, 09:07 pm »
(You know on the flip side, actors have to memorize their lines, we read ours out of book, board ops hit a button when we tell them to . . . )

1129
The Green Room / Re: How to recover from mistakes
« on: Apr 11, 2011, 12:17 pm »
Make more mistakes so when you do make mistakes, they are less noticeable.

No, seriously, we are not superhuman, we make mistakes.

We are human.  They quicker we develop thick skin, the ability to own up, move on, learn and avoid the mistakes in the future . . . the better.

The issue is . . . do we make the same mistake twice.


1130
The Green Room / Facebook Settings
« on: Apr 11, 2011, 03:13 am »
So, I am sure everyone here is just a bit more facebook savvy then me, but here's a little hint.

I would go right now, and change all your Privacy settings to Friends Only.  (Under Account, Privacy Settings.)

Of course, everyone's favorite game to play pre-production is internet the cast - well we were facebooking a new cast member, and I had all this information the rest of the team didn't have - why?  He was a friend of a friend.  Now, I got the drunk pictures, info, everything.

But made me think, in this world of people just being one degree of separation, it might be nice to turn up the privacy, or maybe just step away from facebook entirely.


1131
Employment / Re: To Break or Not to Break
« on: Apr 09, 2011, 11:48 pm »
Yeah, but PSMKay, no one should sit there and moan about the path not taken . . . you can't.  (I do have to tell you the four or five people I know that have gone down the cirque path, and have returned, one absolutely heart broken to find out our their dream job was no such thing - just proving that a job is a job, and making something out to be MORE then that can lead to trouble.)

I think you always, always, always have to look forward, and make the best decision based upon the knowledge you have, but also remember that that you are a business, and what is the smart BUSINESS move for you . . . sometimes, heck, a lot of time, I think there is way too much emotion involved in some of these choices . . . and I have to admit the impending conflicting contracts I have coming up does not only have some career issues, but does have some emotional issues tied up on.

I have to admit, one of the hardest part of freelancing is the "kid in the candy store" mentality - trying to do it all - and having to breathe and realize, there will be other shows - and no one person can do every show.

But, you have to think of what is best for you, what is best for your business model, what is best for your reputation - and I do know a lot of this has to do with where you are in your career . . . some people can step away from a show and find three more easily, where if you are earlier in your career - it might not be as smart a choice.


1132
Employment / Re: To Break or Not to Break
« on: Apr 09, 2011, 03:01 pm »
I think the devil is in figuring out . . .

1) How much better does the gig need to be?
2) How much better does the pay need to be?

and

3) How do you ever quantitatively figure out if a how if a show will HELP your career or if breaking a contract with HURT your career?  You can't look into the future . . . it's always a gamble of some sort, eah?

I do think there are some extremes . . .

You are doing an off-off Broadway and pickup a production contract show.
You are doing a short run and get a long run contract or staff position.
No pay gig and then get a paying gig.

I think at the end of the day, it's the more subtle differences that make some choices harder - especially for someone like me who has been sort of faithful dog to companies.

I have broken contract three times.

1) Early in my career, first day of tech, my partner's father died (and we had to deal with international issues to deal with his body and his estate).  I had to travel back to my home town to deal with many, many issues.  I was able to open the show, and hand it over to another ASM.

2) I sent in a contract to an opera company for an ASM position, and the day I dropped in the mail, I was offered a full time staff position with a LORT company. I called them up to tell them I was going to have to break the contract.  I gave them three months notice.

3) When I left my last gig, I gave them 8 weeks notice to leave after six years . . . but upper management new I was looking for new work, and was planning on leaving at some point.  It was not a surprise.

Everytime, you think . . . well, that's it.

But, you know . . . if the reasons are good enough, people understand.   

1133
Employment / To Break or Not to Break
« on: Apr 08, 2011, 07:34 pm »
So, this may become an issue right away for me, but let's talk about this in a general, out there kind of way.

You have a signed contract for a show. 

You get an offer for a better show, but it means breaking the contract - and by breaking the contract, we wean using the out that is outlined in the contract.

Do you ever break a contract?  How much better does the second show have to be?  (10% pay raise?  20% pay raise?)  Does it have be a "better" gig?  (Better type of show?  better theatre?  better gig?)

Thoughts?

Discuss . . . would love to talk this out before I have to deal with the reality of the situation - would love to talk about calmly and rationally without emotions wrapped up.

 

1134
The Hardline / Re: Reports
« on: Apr 08, 2011, 05:50 pm »
No, no, no, no, no, no . . .

Any communication that is deputy or SM to the union SHOULD NOT pass through the company manager NOR any member of the theater management.

Yes, a company manager might stop a report that would result in a fine. 

And there might be some sort of paypack, if there is an actor who tends to speak up about issues.

I don't like to keep a copy of the forms, such as accident reports, etc - for a variety of confidentially issues - having multiple copies makes it harder to control the confidentially of all of them.

Also, having had my book brought into two legal issues - I prefer to not have such items under my control when they are obviously better under the control of other departments - or the union directly.


1135
Stage Management: Plays & Musicals / Re: Re: TECH: Paper Tech
« on: Apr 06, 2011, 09:44 pm »
Once we start tech, sometimes they hand me a sheet of paper with a list of cues and cue number/name assignments, along w their rough placement, which I load into my book, and sometimes the LD or SD gives me the cues as we go - but either way, it comes from them.

I think this is VERY common, especially for Sound Designers . . . not so often for lighting designers, who tend need actors in the space to do their job.

Edit added attribution to quote-Rebbe

1136
Stage Management: Plays & Musicals / Re: Re: TECH: Paper Tech
« on: Apr 06, 2011, 02:11 pm »
Maybe it's because I don't know terms, but I'm wondering if what I do is a form of paper tech...

I'm currently the ASM for a production, and the SM never gives me anything to do, and so now that we're out of the blocking phase, I've just been sitting there. So one day I went through the script and wrote all the light,sound,fly and any other cues down in order, and asked the director abot any other cues he wanted added or taken away from the script. I'm emailing the sound cue's to our sound guy ( he's the designer, and sound board operator I think.)

Is this at all like a paper tech, or was I just doing my job?

Well, this is sort of a paper tech. BUT . . . maybe at the level you are working at this is acceptable, but doing this without the SM's knowledge is probably not the best thing to do - it sort of smacks of working around the boss.

Also, and maybe it's because the stuff I work on it so out of the box, I would never even pretend to tell any designer where a cue goes . . . that's a designer's job's. (granted, I don't do a lot of shows where an actor comes in and switches on a light switch).  If a director mentions something such as a light change, or a pool of light, or a some sort of light effect, I will pass it on to the designer so the designer and the director can discuss . . . but for any member of the stage manager to tell a designer where a cue goes might be a big crossing over the line.

This way the Director can just sit in tech with a good book and say yes or no to small detail decisions. It makes the process go much faster as opposed to the director constantly interjecting and discussing the nature of each individual cue. ( Though the few times that's happened to me she was a pretty overbearing and micro-managing director)

I had a good chuckle over this.  A director reading a good book during the tech process?  A director being considered overbearing for mico-managing?  What do you think their job is? 

Directors are hired to delivered a final finished product for the producer.  Ultimately, every decision that is made about the production -- every cue, every prop, everything has to serve the director's vision --because ultimately they are responsible for the final product.  It was their responsibility.  (Just like much of the burden of delivering the finished product by opening night is our responsibility - whatever that finished product maybe.)

So any director who spends tech with a good book in hand and is NOT micro-managing is a director who perhaps has checked out a bit . . . and one who is, should not be called overbearing, but just be acknowledge as doing their job.

Paper tech is a great tool, but remember, you should start paper teching from the first day you look at the designs, the first day you start staging.  Ever day you stage, you should be adjusting your run sheets, figuring out if what you staged can be accomplished given the physical and production limitations you are producing under.  You need to be able to turn to your director immediately and go - that's great staging, but the table just exited stage left, we have no way to get to stage right to re-enter in 2 minutes. 

I feel like by the end of the rehearsal process, if I was to have a paper tech - without the knowledge of what I learn in the theatre, a papertech would be me giving information OUT to designers, not me getting information.  At the end of four weeks, I feel like I would have all the information I would possibly get. 

Don't get too over zealous and TELL designers where cues go - you may communicate where the director wants a cue, or what the script is asking for, but a designer may come up with something that is better - that is the magic of collaboration.

Be prepared for a Director or designers who just don't want to "waste" time on this.  Don't be offended.  Most of the time - creative types don't like to make decisions before they absolutely have to . . . and sitting down and making design decisions without seeing things happen in the space may feel very artificial and against what they feel like is important to them as an artist.  On the flip side, you might be able to talk to them about getting a vocabulary for scene changes, so you figure out how to go off and dry tech things on your own.

If you have automation - then I think the stakes are raised higher and you must sit down and at least get some things dry tech so some cues can be written and pre-cued.  You may need help from higher up to get people to sit down and make some decisions in a timely manner.  (And remember, this might push you into over time).

Be prepared to do the dry tech by yourself in pieces . . . especially as designers are not in town or are not available.  Remember, sometimes we are lucky to get a designer for one run thru before tech.  (And I thought this was just for regional theatre, but I am learning in even on Broadway . . . designers rarely come in for more then one run . . .  one designer said "If I see too many runs, I get frustrated by the changes . . . what I really want to see is one run, a month before tech, where I am promised they won't change any blocking.")

And remember, you can spend hours dry teching, but once you get into the theatre, it can all change in an instant.  Be flexible.


Edit added attribution to second quote.-Rebbe

1137
Most adults (and even working children) will come to the stage manager if they have a serious allergy and mention it.  I have to admit in my 22 years of doing this professionally, I have never had to ban a food item from rehearsal.

1138
The Hardline / Re: Prompt Script Etiquette
« on: Apr 05, 2011, 12:40 pm »
Yeah . . . I have thought about keeping my script in code or dirty, but at the end of the day, my pride battles that.


1139
The Hardline / Re: Periodic Performance Contract
« on: Apr 05, 2011, 07:38 am »
I have done votes over the phone on a several occasions . . . especially for one day events, or first day schedules (like you have to do a straight six on the first day . . .).

Given the uniqueness of the situation, call the cast, explain the situation, the producer's solution and see how the cast responds.  It seems like the producer's is genuinely trying to solve the problem - hopefully everyone will be happy with it.

1140
The Hardline / Re: Prompt Script Etiquette
« on: Apr 05, 2011, 07:33 am »


The LORT rule about preparing an additional script is as follows:

(J) Production Script.
(1) It is agreed that it is the duty of the Stage Manager to assemble and maintain the
production script for the actual technical and artistic operation of the production and
that the production script remains the property of the Theatre.
(2) No Stage Manager or Assistant Stage Manager will be required to prepare any
additional production script or book for publication or archival purposes or for use in
any other production of the play or musical.
(3) In the event the Theatre does request a Stage Manager or Assistant Stage
Manager to prepare an additional script or alter the script for any of the above
purposes, the Stage Manager or Assistant Stage Manager may agree provided that he
is paid no less than $350.00 for each such preparation.


Now, the question is, if you just have a clean enough copy of the script that doesn't require additional work should there be payment.

I would talk to the business rep and discuss the specifics of this, especially as co-productions are going to be on the rise.


Pages: 1 ... 74 75 [76] 77 78 ... 148